WUW talk:Mod Powers

By signatures, do you mean just the colorful ones with pictures or anything that links to your page? 12:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Why can't we have signitures if we want to be a mod?- nehnjaduehk 15:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Pretty sure he means you can't use your signature while applying for mod and should sign your name like this when applyng for mod. The Noid

Oh, OK. And, Super Sam, I think there's a more time effective way to do this. Just set up some rules to qualify for a mod. Here are some examples.

• • • You must have been active here for at least 6 months.
    • You can't have ever trolled, flamed, or anything else that would've gotten you blocked.
    • It will improve your chances if you helped out here and made a good quality fanstuff.

And if you don't get powers, whining about it will destroy any chances left. 22:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

The second rule makes it impossible for anybody to be eligible, and the third is just borderline dumb. They call me Big T BLOOD 23:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Are you saying that everyone trolled here at least once? 12:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

No, it's probably the flamed part. 大棒さっさと棍子 12:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Flaming counts as trolling, I think. 12:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

No, I disagree. I always saw trolling as actively trying to disrupt the site. Flaming is singling a person out. However, flaming is so commonly used in trolling they're often confused. Ekul^∞ 04:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

I have to say, not everybody flames on here. But still. Remember that more than not flaming, it's a good idea to have a good judge of motivation and class when moderating people. Ekul^∞ 14:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

"good quality fanstuff"

IRONY - SKUB ? 14:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

You know, personally I think only JCM and Chaos are qualified enough. Lex 21:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

This may be because I know him so well, but I think Strong Sader would be an excellent mod if he applied. He's got good judgement, and he's very careful. He can take advice really seriously, and he analyzes his options before he acts too quickly. Ekul^∞

thecheese supports nachoman and all of his stances even though hes bi :) TheCheese 00:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

So, how do we do this? If someone isn't qualified for mod powers, you take them off they list without powers and if the are qualified, you take them off the list with powers? 01:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

SURE THING - Super Sam 01:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Uh, so is that a yes? 00:26, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm not a mod, but I think we should ALL be able to upload by url. They call me Big T BLOOD 01:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm serious. Is that a yes? 22:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't feel that fourth gens (Raiku/Lemon Demon43) should be made moderator despite activity on the Wiki User Wiki, and even if they had an account, they were inconspicuous to most of us on the HRFWiki. Chaos, having 8.3k contributions doesn't attribute to anything other than boasting.

But this is my opinion, which again, no one cares about. User:Vindicator/sig 00:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm third gen. I was Raggon in early 2007. Brerose 00:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

And Lemon was Pie123. ...Wait, are 4th Gens those who joined after the purge? belstrnnmmvnmn 00:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Supposedly, but I say the 4th gen joined after the purge was announced. They call me Big T BLOOD 00:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I was in 2007 first, so I'm not a fourth gen. Brerose 00:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree with vindi. Miss Peach

Yes Raiku, but you didn't really make a name for yourself and more or less, you were inconspicuous to most, if not all people on the HRFWiki, earning your spot as a fourth gen. User:Vindicator/sig 00:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Gens depend on WHEN you were on the wiki. Brerose 00:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

No one has put you in the third gen as of yet, due to the lack of knowledge around you. Only you yourself have put yourself in the third gen. User:Vindicator/sig 00:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I put him in the third gen. belstrnnmmvnmn 00:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Why can we always seem to pin it on the crazy guy? They call me Big T BLOOD 00:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Going against what I said, it isn't the generation that matters, it's the activity that the user puts out. Now, in the time that I was active on the HRFWiki, I don't remember seeing a Raggon in there. I do remember seeing some of you other folk though. User:Vindicator/sig 00:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

HURR DURR I'M A THIRD GEN SO GIVE ME MODERATOR User:Vindicator/sig 00:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

hey guys

all of you are third gens

quit fighting amongst yourselves TheCheese 00:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

True dat. By the way, I remember Raiku being Gavino, but never Raggon. 00:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

>vindicator

>third-gen

no thecheese just no User:Vindicator/sig 01:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I was very noobish, and only on for a day or two until I forgot my password. Brerose 01:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

There are no such things as fourth gens they just don't want to be known as dirty thirdies - Super Sam 01:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Filthy Fourthie sounds worse than Dirty Thirdie. belstrnnmmvnmn 01:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

True-dat -tdoyle.me

i never got blocked Thus Spake Lilfut

Raiku's Vote

I'm not being biased, and i'm not a sysop, but I can see who's wrong and right for the job.

• Tahu/Lilfut - Isn't too active.
• Chaos - Has the potential, and is a sysop at an offical wiki.
• Lemon - Could make it, however he does revert even on not so vandalism, but I'm leaning towards him.
• Bell - Umm, lighten up. You could make it, but probaly not.
• Ninjaduck - Has been inactive lately.
• Zoo - Probaly good for the job, as he isn't sarcastic and would take the job seriously.
• StrongRad - Umm, yeah, Ewiki isn't popular, no one really likes it.
• The thing - I don't really see any vandalism reverting in your contribs, and you are inactive.
• Badstar - Has great edits, is a good vandal reverter, I would say yes.
• Kirbychu - You just came out of inactivity, and we don't really know your potenital.

Brerose 04:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Dude, how do you not know my potential? I ran a wiki and I've been a member for over a year, how does a month of inactivity due to a broken laptop suddenly make me not applicable?--Kirbychu 04:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey, i said that my opinion does not affect it. This is what I think. Dude, you could be a good mod. Brerose 04:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Make up your mind, do you not know my potential, or do you think I have good potential?--Kirbychu 04:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't really know you, but you COULD be a good mind, dammit Brerose 04:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

...You confuse me. Don't even bother trying to explain more 'cause I'll just get more confused.--Kirbychu 04:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

• FACT: eveyone here has already had a wiki of his own at one point or another because he thought it was , no exceptions
• FACT 2: getting confused only shows your lack of mod potential

DON'T COMPLAINS -from the desk of 20eric06^t-AES 16:31, 4 May 2009 (UTC)