Talk:The Void/Play/1

Wouldn't it make more sense if it was all under one section, not split? This is a little confusing.--Kirbychu 02:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I dunno. If it was all in one section, we'd force people to act in the location we're all in. This way, everyone can do their own thing. - X On Fire 02:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

They coud do a "cut to area" so to speak.

example:

{Kirbychu is in the water slide.}

KIRBYCHU HR'D: YAY!

{Cut to the shed walls. X On Fire is sitting on the roof.}

X ON FIRE: W00T!

{Cut back to Kirbychu.}

Get is?--Kirbychu 02:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Personaly, I like X's organization better. - Vince Gagoman 02:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

What ever. I don't care.--Kirbychu 02:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Now that I think of it, this could make problems when reading it. Hmm... - X On Fire 02:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

For better ease and collaboration while playing, please get on IRC and go to #wikiuserwiki . -Chwoka 04:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

My compy can't access IRC, so no. Just discuss here.--Kirbychu 04:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I can't type one line without getting Edit Conflicted. Congratulations. They call me Big T BLOOD 04:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I was edit conflicted 13 times once!--Kirbychu 04:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Cool. They call me Big T BLOOD 04:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Chwoka's Plot!

It can run completely concurrent to what you guys are doing through the magic of jump-cuts. Along with that, it makes for one of THE most interesting plots in the netirety of the WUW. As it stands, this is mostly just fantasizing about excessive luxury. If we implement this, it sheds everything in a new light - an EPIC light. Please reconsider. -Chwoka 04:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

It's not gonna work. I agree that it's really awesome, but I doubt that they'll like it. After all, we are talking about people with possibly less than two digits in their age. - SKUB ? 04:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I like the idea. I am just going with the flow. --Kanjiro 04:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

...No. We've already set out our plot, and your drug use plot isn't in it. I won't stand for the use of drugs in our game. Also, Skull, we're not all young. I still don't approve of this. - X On Fire 04:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I've gotta say, though. It would make an awesome story. - SKUB ? 04:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I submit that we stop playing until we can figure this out.-Chwoka 04:19, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Only leaders can control plots. Me and X came up with this idea earlier today, and this is WAY different then we want. NO DRUGS.--Kirbychu 04:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, gee, that's nice and all. "WHAT'S THAT!? AN EVOLVING PLOT? STUFF THAT IMPROVES ALL OF THE WRITING BY SHEEDDING IT IN A NEW LIGHT!? MILDLY OFFENSIVE!? WE MUST STOP THIS DEVIL!"-Chwoka 04:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Shed it in all the lights you want to. It's not yours, so we decide what goes and what doesn't. - X On Fire 04:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

The fact that it's nothing like what me and X came up with, and the fact that it's "mildly" offensive is what drives me away from it.--Kirbychu 04:27, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry man. These ideas are too evolved for this. - SKUB ? 04:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Darn. I could create a different fanstuff with this as the premise, but it's not the same when the writers of the characters know about it, then the characters act differently. :/ Should I do it anyway? -Chwoka 04:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

You mean like, a non-canon spin-off?--Kirbychu 04:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Not a spin-off, a completely different series.-Chwoka 04:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

If it's a completely different series then I could care less. Go ahead.--Kirbychu 04:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Just please, PLEASE, don't use us. - X On Fire 04:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

This totally doesn't ruin the actions of the characters and the chance for membership!] -Chwoka