WUW talk:Wiki Guidelines - Revision history

Remolay: /* RULE DISCUSSION THING I */

2013-09-06T01:21:14Z

‎RULE DISCUSSION THING I

2013-09-06T01:03:19Z

2013-09-06T01:02:02Z

‎RULE DISCUSSION THING I

2013-09-06T00:24:20Z

2013-09-06T00:20:53Z

‎RULE DISCUSSION THING I

2013-09-06T00:14:21Z

2013-08-31T22:26:06Z

2013-08-31T22:22:28Z

and with the typical traffic of users that this wiki has seen, you know they will

2013-08-31T22:20:26Z

2013-08-31T22:03:21Z

‎RULE DISCUSSION THING I

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 6 September 2013
Line 431:		Line 431:
	:::There may be people who come and have no idea how to do it		:::There may be people who come and have no idea how to do it
	:::I redeleted it, but if you put it back up, I won't revert it again. {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 01:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)		:::I redeleted it, but if you put it back up, I won't revert it again. {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 01:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
		+	::::Most everything one this site follows that guideline, and transcripts on other wikis follow a similar rule. For something that might be in a transcript format, which it honestly doesn't have to be (The wording of the rule doesn't require transcripts), if one wants to, it would be a good idea to have rule. {{User:Remolay/sig}} 01:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 6 September 2013
Line 427:		Line 427:
	:yeah do that {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 00:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)		:yeah do that {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 00:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
	::Given that, we might not need 1.2, but I haven't re-deleted it. I will not put up a fuss if it is. I've modified 1.3 to be worded better (Read less confusing to new users if that ever happens again), but I honestly believe it is necessary.		::Given that, we might not need 1.2, but I haven't re-deleted it. I will not put up a fuss if it is. I've modified 1.3 to be worded better (Read less confusing to new users if that ever happens again), but I honestly believe it is necessary.
		+	:::May I ask why?
		+	:::The type of writing we do isn't common anywhere else
		+	:::There may be people who come and have no idea how to do it
		+	:::I redeleted it, but if you put it back up, I won't revert it again. {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 01:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:02, 6 September 2013
Line 426:		Line 426:
	:except, worship him		:except, worship him
	:yeah do that {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 00:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)		:yeah do that {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 00:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
		+	::Given that, we might not need 1.2, but I haven't re-deleted it. I will not put up a fuss if it is. I've modified 1.3 to be worded better (Read less confusing to new users if that ever happens again), but I honestly believe it is necessary.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 6 September 2013
Line 422:		Line 422:

	On 1.3, The Transcription Standards don't actually exist, but why get rid of a rule we actually all follow anyway? {{User:Remolay/sig}} 00:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)		On 1.3, The Transcription Standards don't actually exist, but why get rid of a rule we actually all follow anyway? {{User:Remolay/sig}} 00:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
		+	:Because if we ever get the user block down then we have a rule that would confuse the shit out of everyone
		+	:also safety measures are useless Sam basically gave us the wiki the rules are ours not his
		+	:except, worship him
		+	:yeah do that {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 00:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 6 September 2013
Line 419:		Line 419:

	and what about 1.3 that rule was useless in the long run {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 00:14, 6 September 2013 (UTC)		and what about 1.3 that rule was useless in the long run {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 00:14, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
		+	:I'd call it a safety measure, plus I love Magic The Gathering's "Don't Follow This Rule" rule.
		+
		+	On 1.3, The Transcription Standards don't actually exist, but why get rid of a rule we actually all follow anyway? {{User:Remolay/sig}} 00:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 6 September 2013
Line 413:		Line 413:
	::::then maybe just a revision to section 2		::::then maybe just a revision to section 2
	::::1.9 is lame but you have a point {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 22:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)		::::1.9 is lame but you have a point {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 22:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
		+	remolay<br>
		+	isn't that
		+
		+	just pointless then
		+
		+	and what about 1.3 that rule was useless in the long run {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 00:14, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 31 August 2013
Line 411:		Line 411:
	:::1.9 prevents the absolute most annoying thing possible on the wiki		:::1.9 prevents the absolute most annoying thing possible on the wiki
	:::and without section 2 people could make signatures that consume entire pages {{User:Chaosvii7/Sig}} 22:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)		:::and without section 2 people could make signatures that consume entire pages {{User:Chaosvii7/Sig}} 22:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
		+	::::then maybe just a revision to section 2
		+	::::1.9 is lame but you have a point {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 22:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 31 August 2013
Line 408:		Line 408:
	::I still don't understand 1.10		::I still don't understand 1.10
	::the 2 and 3 sections are useless in my opinion but if someone can explain how they're useful then I'll listen {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 22:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)		::the 2 and 3 sections are useless in my opinion but if someone can explain how they're useful then I'll listen {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 22:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::1.9 prevents the absolute most annoying thing possible on the wiki
		+	:::and without section 2 people could make signatures that consume entire pages {{User:Chaosvii7/Sig}} 22:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 31 August 2013
Line 403:		Line 403:
	and why am I so cool {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 21:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)		and why am I so cool {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 21:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
	:1.1 needs a revision, we don't need 1.2 or 1.3, 1.6 is garbage, 1.9 is absolutely necessary {{User:Chaosvii7/Sig}} 22:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)		:1.1 needs a revision, we don't need 1.2 or 1.3, 1.6 is garbage, 1.9 is absolutely necessary {{User:Chaosvii7/Sig}} 22:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
		+	::how is 1.9 necessary?
		+	::1.5 is slightly meh but I'd say we keep it so we don't have random pages everywhere
		+	::1.7 could probably use a revision and 1.4 is necessary
		+	::I still don't understand 1.10
		+	::the 2 and 3 sections are useless in my opinion but if someone can explain how they're useful then I'll listen {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 22:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 31 August 2013
Line 402:		Line 402:

	and why am I so cool {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 21:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)		and why am I so cool {{User:Sirrus/siggy}} 21:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
		+	:1.1 needs a revision, we don't need 1.2 or 1.3, 1.6 is garbage, 1.9 is absolutely necessary {{User:Chaosvii7/Sig}} 22:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)