https://wuw.clamburger.org/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Definitions_of_a_Good_Piece_of_Work 2026-05-07T23:59:59Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.28.2 https://wuw.clamburger.org/w/index.php?title=Definitions_of_a_Good_Piece_of_Work&diff=127091&oldid=prev 2009-04-01T15:57:38Z

<p>step three tomorrow</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Welp.<br /> <br /> I promised myself I wouldn't mention Raiku in this, but really, there are some parts in which I just ''have'' too.<br /> <br /> ==Step 1==<br /> '''COMEDY'''<br /> <br /> [[Records Of Bell|Some people]] can be forgiven for thinking this entirely optional: but I'd like to tell you of one of the most popular fanstuffs on the site (though personally I don't read it, but m'okay): [[The SkullB Show|This one.]] Why? Because it tries to have a sense of humour about itself, even in the frustratingly dark scenes. Learn from this, [[Records Of Bell|show!]]<br /> <br /> ==Step 2==<br /> '''ACTUALLY GOOD WRITING'''<br /> <br /> This is where my lack-of-Raiku mentioning falls off a cliff and into the channel: he can be acquaited to Gears of War to the brilliance of it. Honestly, making you characters have actual fudgin' depth is rather important to. (see just about everyone else on the wiki for info). To learn how to do things right, read 1984, or The Tweenies or something.</div>

StroHersh